Triple-Seronegative Myasthenia Gravis: Study Shows 1 in 3 Patients Had Refractory Disease
Investigators of a retrospective study found that approximately one-third of patients with triple-seronegative myasthenia gravis (tSNMG) had treatment-refractory disease, challenging the perception that antibody-negative myasthenia gravis (MG) generally follows a milder clinical course. Researchers analyzed 196 patients with MG at a single neuromuscular center, identifying 26 (13.3%) who tested negative for acetylcholine receptor, muscle-specific tyrosine kinase, and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 antibodies. Of these, nine (34.6%) met criteria for refractory disease. Compared with nonrefractory patients, those with refractory tSNMG were more frequently female (77.8% vs 14.3%), had thymic abnormalities (88.9% vs 28.6%), and reported respiratory symptoms during their disease course (88.9% vs 28.6%). Although 76.9% of patients achieved a favorable response to prednisone, fewer than half achieved pharmacologic remission or minimal manifestations at their most recent assessment. Among 12 patients who underwent thymectomy, six (50%) had favorable outcomes at one year, although responses were substantially lower in the refractory subgroup.
These findings underscore the importance of recognizing MG even when conventional antibody testing is negative and closely monitoring patients for signs of treatment resistance. Fluctuating muscle weakness, ocular or bulbar symptoms, and respiratory complaints warrant careful assessment, with repetitive nerve stimulation or single-fiber electromyography helping support diagnosis when serologic testing is inconclusive. The study also highlights the challenges of managing refractory tSNMG, including dependence on corticosteroids and variable responses to conventional immunosuppressive treatments. Azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil produced favorable responses in some patients, whereas rituximab showed limited benefit among those with refractory disease. However, the small sample size and retrospective design prevent definitive comparisons of treatment effectiveness or identification of reliable predictors of refractoriness. An accompanying narrative review of eight studies involving 299 seronegative MG patients similarly identified substantial variability in treatment responses and outcomes. The authors emphasize the need for standardized diagnostic criteria, individualized treatment strategies, and greater inclusion of antibody-negative patients in clinical trials to improve disease management.
Reference: Veltsista D, Tzartos J, Liampas I, Kefalopoulou Z, Chroni E. Treatment challenges in triple seronegative myasthenia gravis: a single-center experience and narrative review of the literature. Acta Neurol Scand. 2026 Apr 8;2026(1):5532283. doi: 10.1155/ane/5532283.
Tanya Geist
RPA-C