Psoriatic Arthritis

Spotlight article

How Early is Early in Psoriatic Arthritis? Insights on Treatment Timing

Despite major advances in biologic and targeted synthetic therapies, the optimal timing for treatment initiation in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) remains uncertain—especially in the early, often undiagnosed, stages of disease. Growing evidence suggests that early intervention—particularly in treatment-naïve patients—may improve outcomes, yet the lack of consensus on what constitutes “early PsA” complicates both diagnosis and research. Recent studies have begun to explore the benefits of initiating b/tsDMARDs earlier, but results are mixed due to variations in trial design, patient populations, and outcome measures.

 

PsA may begin with subclinical symptoms—often enthesitis—before joint damage is evident. Imaging has revealed inflammation in patients with psoriasis (PsO) but no clinical arthritis, suggesting a possible window of opportunity for disease interception. However, no standardized definition exists for “pre-clinical” or “early” PsA, and diagnostic delays remain common. Observational data hint that biologic treatment for PsO may reduce the risk of developing PsA, but further prospective studies are needed. Ultimately, narrowing the time to diagnosis, identifying reliable biomarkers, and refining early treatment strategies are critical to achieving better long-term outcomes and potentially disease remission for patients with PsA.

 

Reference: Hen O, Harrison SR, De Marco G, et al. Early psoriatic arthritis: when is the right time to start advanced therapy? Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2024 Jul 27;16:1759720X241266727. doi: 10.1177/1759720X241266727. PMID: 39071239; PMCID: PMC11283661.

Nancy Eisenberger

DNP, FNP-BC

Family Nurse Practitioner, Arthritis, Rheumatic and Bone Disease Associates

Featured article

When Psoriatic Arthritis Persists: Treatment for Complex Cases

The treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has evolved from NSAIDs and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) to biologics and targeted synthetic DMARDs, enabling more personalized approaches. However, due to disease complexity and comorbidities such as obesity or cardiovascular risk, response to therapy can be variable. Emerging research highlights the importance of understanding both inflammatory and non-inflammatory contributors to disease activity, especially in patients who don’t respond to initial therapies.

 

Treatment sequencing remains a challenge, particularly in patients who are refractory or intolerant to TNF inhibitors. While newer agents like IL-17, IL-23, and JAK inhibitors show promise—even in treatment-experienced populations—there’s still no clear algorithm for optimal sequencing. Biomarkers and machine learning are under study to predict response, but clinical judgment remains key. Some studies suggest IL-17 inhibitors may work better in patients with obesity or metabolic comorbidities. The role of musculoskeletal ultrasound, lifestyle interventions, and even dual-targeted therapy is expanding, offering potential support for those with persistent symptoms. A more individualized, mechanism-based approach—considering both inflammatory and centralized pain pathways—may help improve outcomes for patients with difficult-to-treat PsA.

 

Reference: Queiro R, Pinto-Tasende JA, Montilla-Morales C. Navigating Psoriatic Arthritis: Treatment Pathways and Patient-Specific Strategies for Improved Outcomes. Drugs. 2025 Jul;85(7):867-882. doi: 10.1007/s40265-025-02192-y. Epub 2025 May 11. PMID: 40350472; PMCID: PMC12185568.

Nancy Eisenberger

DNP, FNP-BC

Gut Microbiota and Psoriatic Arthritis: A New Frontier in Diagnosis and Treatment

The diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is frequently delayed due to variable clinical presentations and the lack of specific biomarkers. Genetic susceptibility, environmental triggers, and immune system dysregulation—particularly via the IL-23/Th17 pathway—contribute to disease onset and progression. Biologic and small-molecule therapies targeting TNF-α, IL-17, IL-23, and JAK pathways have significantly improved patient outcomes by reducing inflammation and preventing joint damage.

 

Mounting evidence also links gut microbiota dysbiosis with PsA development. Studies show that patients with PsA have reduced microbial diversity and lower levels of butyrate-producing bacteria such as Faecalibacterium and Akkermansia, which help maintain gut integrity and immune balance. Dysbiosis may contribute to systemic inflammation and immune dysfunction, potentially triggering or worsening PsA. Microbiota-focused interventions—probiotics, prebiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), phage therapy, and dietary changes—are under investigation as adjunctive treatments. While early results are encouraging, more research is needed to determine their safety, efficacy, and role in personalized PsA care.

 

Reference: Bonomo MG, D'Angelo S, Picerno V, et al. Recent Advances in Gut Microbiota in Psoriatic Arthritis. Nutrients. 2025 Apr 11;17(8):1323. doi: 10.3390/nu17081323. PMID: 40284188; PMCID: PMC12030176.

Nancy Eisenberger

DNP, FNP-BC

Microbiome May Hold Clues to Diagnosing Psoriatic Arthritis With Enthesitis

Researchers explored the role of gut microbiota in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), particularly those presenting with enthesitis and dactylitis, compared to patients with undifferentiated arthritis lacking these features (NO PsA). Using 16S rRNA sequencing, researchers analyzed fecal samples from 9 patients with PsA and 10 patients with NO PsA, excluding those with other defined autoimmune diseases. While standard clinical lab tests could not distinguish between the groups, microbiome analysis revealed notable differences. Specifically, Megasphaera elsdenii was found at levels 10,000 times higher in PsA patients, while the family XIII_AD3011 was more prevalent in the NO PsA group.

 

The findings suggest that gut microbiota composition is more closely associated with the presence of enthesitis and dactylitis than conventional serum markers. Patients with PsA exhibited greater microbial homogeneity within the group and higher heterogeneity when compared to NO PsA patients. These microbial signatures, particularly Megasphaera elsdenii and Bifidobacterium longum (the latter showing a negative correlation with eosinophils), may serve as potential biomarkers for differentiating PsA from other forms of arthritis. A larger study with deeper biochemical analysis is recommended to validate these preliminary results and further explore the gut-joint axis in inflammatory arthritis.

 

Reference: Lin CY, Hsu CY, He HR, et al. Gut microbiota differences between psoriatic arthritis and other undifferentiated arthritis: A pilot study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 15;101(28):e29870. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029870. PMID: 35839060; PMCID: PMC11132366.

Robert Laugherty

JD, MBA, PA-C

POCN CoE Logo

© 2025 POCN—an IQVIA business. All Rights Reserved.