NSCLC

Spotlight article

Closing Gaps in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Biomarker Testing

Comprehensive biomarker testing is essential for optimal non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) care in advanced disease and increasingly relevant in adjuvant settings. To drive universal testing, the American Cancer Society National Lung Cancer Roundtable held a 2020 summit and issued a strategic plan to address system barriers with standardized terminology/education, decision tools and reflex workflows, guidance on tissue and assay selection (favoring broad-panel next-generation sequencing), and payer-alignment advocacy. The plan stresses timely testing during diagnostic/staging steps, multidisciplinary coordination to ensure adequate tissue and fast turnaround, and equity-focused efforts to reduce disparities.

 

Testing remains inconsistent, with legacy biomarkers (EGFR, ALK) being frequently assessed, while newer targets lag and PD-L1 testing can vary. Obstacles include insufficient tissue, long turnaround times, heterogeneous reporting, and reimbursement hurdles. Recommended solutions include reflex panel testing, standardized reports with treatment algorithms, performance metrics and feedback, payer evidence guides, and model legislation to guarantee coverage. Liquid biopsy is endorsed as a complementary tool—useful when tissue is limited—while confirming negatives with tissue when feasible. As biomarker-directed treatments expand earlier, consistent, comprehensive testing and streamlined workflows are critical to match patients to targeted therapies, immunotherapies, and trials.

 

Reference: Fox AH, Osarogiagbon RU, Farjah F, wt al. The American Cancer Society National Lung Cancer Roundtable strategic plan: Advancing comprehensive biomarker testing in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer. 2024;130(24):4188-4199. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34628.

Michelle M. Turner

MSN, CRNP

Oncology Nurse Practitioner, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center

Featured article

Aumolertinib Plus Chemotherapy Extends PFS in EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With TSG Co-Alterations

Frontline aumolertinib plus carboplatin/pemetrexed significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) vs aumolertinib alone for EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with concomitant tumor suppressor gene (TSG) alterations in the phase 3 ACROSS-2 trial. At 25.3 months median follow-up, investigator-assessed median PFS was 19.8 months with the combination vs 16.5 months with monotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34–0.91; P=.021). Benefit was consistent in key subgroups with TP53 co-mutations (18.7 vs 16.3 months; HR 0.55; P=.024) and numerically favored the combination in EGFR 19del (not reached vs 16.3 months; HR 0.46; P=.055) and L858R (18.7 vs 16.5 months; HR 0.63; P=.154). Overall response rates were similar (70.4% vs 67.2%), and disease control was high in both arms (92.6% vs 98.4%).

 

Safety reflected added chemotherapy: In the combination arm, common any-grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included anemia (61%), decreased white blood cell count (54%), AST/ALT elevations (52%/48%), and decreased neutrophils (44%). Monotherapy had lower overall TEAE rates, with the most often reported being creatine kinase elevation (42%), transaminase elevations (27%/19%), and rash (20%). These data support aumolertinib-chemotherapy as a feasible option to improve PFS in EGFR-mutated NSCLC with co-occurring TSG alterations, while balancing higher myelosuppression and hepatic laboratory abnormalities associated with chemotherapy.

 

Reference: DiEugenio J. Aumolertinib Plus Chemotherapy Improves PFS in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC. OncLive. Published September 7, 2025. Accessed September 22, 2025. https://www.onclive.com/view/aumolertinib-plus-chemotherapy-improves-pfs-in-egfr-mutated-nsclc

Victoria Sherry

DNP, CRNP, ANP-BC, AOCNP

Traditional Biomarkers Fall Short in First-Line Immunochemotherapy for EGFR/ALK– Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

In a prospective multicenter cohort of 162 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (EGFR/ALK–) treated with first-line immunochemotherapy, traditional biomarkers were inconsistent, with higher tumor mutation burden (TMB) tracked with longer progression-free survival (PFS), and PD-L1 correlated with response but not survival. Genomics highlighted signals such as ARID1A mutations (with high PD-L1) predicting response, KDM6A predicting worse overall survival (OS), and RTK-RAS pathway mutations associating with better PFS. ARID1B co-mutations with DNA damage response genes marked poorer survival. A seven-feature genomic risk score (RS) independently predicted PFS beyond TMB, separating low- vs high-risk groups with clear PFS/OS differences, and was validated internally and in external datasets.

 

Hematoxylin and eosin-stained tumor slides analyzed by HoVer-Net quantified tumor microenvironment cell types. A higher epithelial-cell proportion was protective for PFS and modestly improved RS performance. Integrating RS with image-derived features produced a multimodal classifier (PMCP) that stratified patients into subgroups with distinct PFS/OS, independent of TMB. Favorable groups showed immune activation while poor-risk groups skewed immunosuppressive, supporting PMCP as a practical framework to refine prognosis and guide first-line immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (ICT) selection, pending broader validation in ICT-treated cohorts.

 

Reference: Han Y, Ma J, Liu Z, et al. Integrating genomic and pathological characteristics to enhance prognostic precision in advanced NSCLC. npj Precis Oncol. 2025;9:271. doi: 10.1038/s41698-025-01056-8.

Victoria Sherry

DNP, CRNP, ANP-BC, AOCNP

Adagrasib in Previously Treated KRAS G12C Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Phase 2 Results

Researchers of a registrational phase 2 cohort of the KRYSTAL-1 study evaluated adagrasib 600 mg twice daily in previously treated KRASG12C-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after platinum chemotherapy and anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Among 116 treated patients (median follow-up 12.9 months; 98.3% pretreated with both chemotherapy and immunotherapy), 112 had measurable disease and 48 achieved a confirmed objective response (overall response rate, 42.9%). Median duration of response was 8.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.2–13.8), median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (95% CI, 4.7–8.4), and at a later cutoff (median follow-up 15.6 months), median overall survival was 12.6 months (95% CI, 9.2–19.2). Objective responses were assessed by blinded independent central review as the primary endpoint.

 

Safety was consistent with prior experience: Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 97.4% of patients (grade 1–2 in 52.6%, grade ≥3 in 44.8%, including two grade 5 events), and led to discontinuation in 6.9%. Overall, adagrasib demonstrated clinical activity and manageable toxicity in this heavily pretreated KRASG12C-mutated NSCLC population, without new safety signals. Findings support adagrasib as a post-chemotherapy targeted option.

 

Reference: Jänne PA, Riely GJ, Gadgeel SM, et al. Adagrasib in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring a KRASG12C Mutation. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(2):120-131. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204619.

Sarah Sagorsky

MPAS, PA-C

POCN CoE Logo

© 2025 POCN—an IQVIA business. All Rights Reserved.