Type 1 Diabetes: Why GMI and A1C May Not Match
In a cross-sectional study of 611 adults with type 1 diabetes using 90 days of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), researchers examined why glucose management indicator (GMI) and laboratory HbA1c can diverge. Frequent glucose excursions that were both high in amplitude and prolonged, particularly excursions peaking with at least 250 mg/dL with a time to peak of at least 90 minutes, were independently associated with higher GMI relative to HbA1c across CGM systems and HbA1c categories. In contrast, coefficient of variation, a commonly used measure of glycemic variability, showed weaker and less consistent associations with GMI-HbA1c discordance.
The findings suggest that CGM may reveal clinically relevant glucose patterns that HbA1c can average out over time. After accounting for excursion burden, GMI and updated GMI showed stronger relationships with albuminuria than HbA1c in the overall cohort, while their ability to identify a high triglyceride-glucose index was greater among patients with the highest excursion burden. However, adding excursion measures as independent predictors did not consistently improve predictive performance, suggesting that excursion structure may be most useful for interpreting GMI rather than serving as a standalone risk marker. Because the study was cross-sectional and conducted at a single tertiary center, the findings do not establish causality and require validation in broader populations.
Reference: Park S, Cho SH, Kim S, et al. High-Amplitude and Prolonged Glucose Excursions as a Key Determinant of Discordance Between Glucose Management Indicator and Glycated Hemoglobin in Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2026 Jul 1;49(7):1221-1230. doi: 10.2337/dc25-2820.
Tina Copple
DNP, APRN, FNP-BC, ADM-BC, CDCES